tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821324510160331412.post2349546356539748293..comments2023-09-21T03:42:04.098-07:00Comments on Musings on Organizational Behavior: Alternative Dispute ResolutionJohn Staytonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09397510418348437008noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821324510160331412.post-79388478562389787332010-04-12T11:22:46.123-07:002010-04-12T11:22:46.123-07:00It's interesting to note the specific cases yo...It's interesting to note the specific cases you showcased. For example, the details regarding Kaiser are really interesting for most students and DU to know, considering a good amount of us are insured by Kaiser. It's a really sneaky way to conduct business, and in fact I bet majority of there clients (including myself) are unaware of the ways big businesses protect there name and shove liability elsewhere.Ben Whitemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10340115984118046840noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821324510160331412.post-27319442667473806142010-04-11T13:28:25.982-07:002010-04-11T13:28:25.982-07:00I liked how you brought in information you learned...I liked how you brought in information you learned outside the class. It makes it a lot more interesting to read. I never thought about how two groups can go to a non-biased place and have a non-biased mediator help them work through conflict, but that such conclusions aren't neccessarily legal and going to occur. It brings me back to the palestinian/israeli conflict in which the US often is the mediator and tries to get each side to learn to live with eachother. Sometimes, during such meetings, things are worked out and leaders say 'yeah we'll stop building on that land' or something to that effect, but since the US can't really enforce such agreements, just help the sides to say they agree, there is still conflict taking place.Liahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14256813421653352775noreply@blogger.com